Re: BUG #4721: All sub-tables incorrectly included in search plan for partitioned table
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #4721: All sub-tables incorrectly included in search plan for partitioned table |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 15819.1237614240@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | BUG #4721: All sub-tables incorrectly included in search plan for partitioned table ("Eric Thompson" <eric.thompson@salliemae.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BUG #4721: All sub-tables incorrectly included in search
plan for partitioned table
Re: BUG #4721: All sub-tables incorrectly included in search plan for partitioned table |
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
"Eric Thompson" <eric.thompson@salliemae.com> writes: > test=# -- remove any irrelevant constraint from the master table, and now > the date partitioning works Hmm. Tracing through this, it seems your child tables have exactly 101 separate constraint clauses; removing one from the parent table gets it down to 100. Which is where the cutoff installed by this patch is: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2008-11/msg00146.php That patch was in response to this complaint: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2008-11/msg00446.php I'm not entirely sure about a better approach; just moving the cutoff around doesn't seem like it will do anything except change who's complaining... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: