Re: Should AT TIME ZONE be volatile?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should AT TIME ZONE be volatile? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1580314.1636658279@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Should AT TIME ZONE be volatile? ("Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel.westermann@dbi-services.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel.westermann@dbi-services.com> writes: > On Thu, 2021-11-11 at 09:52 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> tzdb has an additional problem, which is that not updating is not an >> option: if you're affected by a DST law change, you want that update, >> and you frequently need it yesterday. We're definitely not set up >> to handle that sort of update process, which is why we recommend >> --with-system-tzdata. > Where in the docs is this recommended? The only place I can find it is here: > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/install-procedure.html Yup, that's exactly the text I was thinking of. Maybe the recommendation should be more enthusiastic --- it was written back when it was still rather questionable whether a platform would have an up-to-date copy of tzdata. (Maybe it still is, at least for the "up-to-date" part.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: