Re: Custom variables and flags, again
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Custom variables and flags, again |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 15777.1226886863@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Custom variables and flags, again (ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Custom variables and flags, again
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp> writes: > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> What happens >> when we add some field or other to those structs? > There are problems when we modify the middle fields in those > structs, but it means modification of existing arguments in > DefineCustomXXXVariable(); The same problems occur in both > implementations. No, they are not the same problems. You can rely on the C compiler to complain if you aren't passing enough arguments to a function. You can't rely on it to complain if your struct constant is putting values into the wrong fields. Perhaps more to the point, guc_tables.h is a file that we don't even want the majority of the backend including. Why would we think it's a good idea to make that part of the public API to external modules? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: