Re: pgsql-server: Fix TAS assembly stuff for Solaris/386.
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql-server: Fix TAS assembly stuff for Solaris/386. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 15775.1095990791@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql-server: Fix TAS assembly stuff for Solaris/386. (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql-server: Fix TAS assembly stuff for
Re: pgsql-server: Fix TAS assembly stuff for Solaris/386. |
Список | pgsql-committers |
Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com> writes: > It passes regression tests, Regression tests on what exactly --- which platform, which compiler? (The gcc and non-gcc paths are different on Solaris, so if you can test both it'd be worth doing. Also someone should verify that I didn't break Solaris/Sparc, same two cases again.) > but adds a warning: > "../../../../src/include/storage/s_lock.h", line 661: warning: /* > encountered inside a comment Oops, my mistake. > There are a number of other warnings in the compile as well. Is our goal > a warning free compile on just gcc or all compilers? Ideally I'd like it warning-free on everything, but I'm not sure how practical that is. The main thing that non-gcc compilers tend to warn about in my experience is "char *" vs "unsigned char *", of which there are a lot of occurrences in and around the multibyte code. This does not really seem worth cleaning up at the moment. If you see anything that looks interesting, or readily fixable, send it in. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: