Re: V14 and later build the backend with -lpthread
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: V14 and later build the backend with -lpthread |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1576030.1661461477@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: V14 and later build the backend with -lpthread (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: V14 and later build the backend with -lpthread
Re: V14 and later build the backend with -lpthread |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes: > I suspect we will end up linked against the threading library anyway > in real-world builds via --with-XXX (I see that --with-icu has that > effect on my FreeBSD system, but I know that details about threading > are quite different in NetBSD). I may lack imagination but I'm > struggling to see how it could break anything. Yeah, there are plenty of situations where you end up with thread support present somehow. So it may be a lost cause. I was mostly concerned about this because it seemed like an unintentional change. (I'm also still struggling to explain why mamba, with the *exact* same NetBSD code on a different hardware platform, isn't showing the same failures as chickadee. More news if I figure that out.) > How should I have done that, by the way? Is the attached the right trick? I think that'd do for preventing side-effects on LIBS, but I'm not sure if we'd have to back-fill something in pgbench's link options. Anyway, as I said to Robert, I'm content to watch and wait for now. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: