Re: WIP patch for LATERAL subqueries
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP patch for LATERAL subqueries |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1571.1346474630@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP patch for LATERAL subqueries (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes: > This is just awesome. Anyways, I was looking around the docs for > references to the old methodology of select list SRF function calls. > This paragraph: > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/xfunc-sql.html#XFUNC-SQL-FUNCTIONS-RETURNING-SET > could probably use some enhancement describing best practices in a > LATERAL world and more examples of dealing with set returning > functions in general. Done, thanks for the suggestion. > I also noticed that the build in SRF page > (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/functions-srf.html) lies > with the comment "This section describes functions that possibly > return more than one row. Currently the only functions in this class > are series generating functions" since at minimum we have 'unnest' so > that page could use some wordsmithing as well. Yeah, there's also some regexp-related SRFs, as well as a boatload of built-in SRFs that are mainly meant to underlie views. I guess we could try to force all of those into this page, but it doesn't really seem like it'd be an improvement. I took out the claim that these were all such functions, instead. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: