Re: Locale + encoding combinations
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Locale + encoding combinations |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 15707.1192025393@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Locale + encoding combinations (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Locale + encoding combinations
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org> writes: > OK so I added the appropriate entries (and posted the patch to > -patches), but my original question remains: why can I only select the > *default* encoding for the chosen locale, but not other ones that are > also be valid according to setlocale? Is this a bug, or is there some > technical reason? Well, the chklocale code is designed around the assumption that there *is* only one encoding for which a locale setting will work, with C/POSIX being a special case. I think we are talking a bit at cross-purposes here, because the Windows equivalent to this notion seems to be "English_United Kingdom.1252" whereas you seem to be defining locale as just "English_United Kingdom". Does it not work the way you want if you make the installer pass locale strings of the first form to initdb? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: