Re: 7.3.2 Regression Failures Worth Looking Into
От | Tom |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 7.3.2 Regression Failures Worth Looking Into |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1568.63.226.186.156.1048998047.squirrel@mail.minnesota.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 7.3.2 Regression Failures Worth Looking Into (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> "Thomas T. Thai" <tom@minnesota.com> writes: >> NetBSD 1.6 / Alpha (64-bit) >> Postgresql 7.3.2 & 7.4-dev >> gcc-3.2.2 > >> I compiled 7.4-dev and had success with all regression tests. However >> when I went back to 7.3.2, about 15 out of 89 tests failed. > > Failed how? Without looking at the diffs, it's impossible to evaluate > the seriousness of the issue. I can send the diffs to you Tom, but it's too big to send to the list. Would that be ok with you? >> I'll be using 7.4-dev, but I'm wondering if it's worth it to the >> Postgresql community if I dig further to see why those tests failed; >> considering that obviously 7.4-dev fixed all of them. > > AFAIK there are not any portability enhancements in 7.4 that might > explain such a difference. So the 7.3 results are interesting. You > should probably rule out pilot error though (does "select version()" > confirm that you rebuilt with the newer compiler?) template1=# select version(); version ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- PostgreSQL 7.3.2 on alpha-unknown-netbsd1.6, compiled by GCC cc (GCC) 3.2.2 (1 row) foo=# select version(); version -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PostgreSQL 7.4devel on alpha-unknown-netbsd1.6, compiled by GCC cc (GCC) 3.2.2 (1 row) Thomas T. Thai
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: