Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> IMHO it is notationally clearer to define a "BufferDescPtr" that
> contains the "volatile" qualifier than to make sure that "volatile" is
> used everywhere that it is needed -- obviously, neither approach is
> fool-proof. But perhaps that's just me...
Personally I dislike hiding type qualifiers like const and volatile
inside typedefs. I agree it's a judgment call.
regards, tom lane