Re: small cleanup: unify scanstr() functions
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: small cleanup: unify scanstr() functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1566954.1601842805@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: small cleanup: unify scanstr() functions (John Naylor <john.naylor@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: small cleanup: unify scanstr() functions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
John Naylor <john.naylor@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 11:19 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> In short: maybe instead of what you have here, leave GUC_scanstr() >> alone except for a possible rename; make bootscanner.l use that; >> and drop the now-unused scanstr(). > v2 done that way. Pushed with very minor adjustments --- mainly, that I rewrote the commit message to emphasize the change in postgres.bki conventions, since that could possibly bite someone in more-surprising ways than simple removal of a function. > - There seem to be a few unused headers included into bootscanner.l. > To keep "#include guc.h" from looking as strange as those, I added a > comment. It might be worth removing those extra includes, but that's > for another day. I went ahead and removed everything in bootscanner.l and bootparse.y that could be removed without provoking a compile error. I was slightly astonished at how many there were. One gets the impression that there was once a good deal of very low-level code in the bootstrap grammar. I didn't try very hard to trace the commit history, but I did note that almost all of the removed #includes dated to 1996 or so. I'm surprised they survived Bruce's occasional attempts at removing unused #includes; maybe his script didn't check .y/.l files. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: