Re: How to union tables and have a field with UNIQUE constraint?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How to union tables and have a field with UNIQUE constraint? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 15666.1010091097@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How to union tables and have a field with UNIQUE constraint? (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: How to union tables and have a field with UNIQUE constraint?
Re: How to union tables and have a field with UNIQUE constraint? |
Список | pgsql-sql |
Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com> writes: > I assume you want to reference id, so you'd need to do something like: > CREATE UNIQUE INDEX t_id_key ON t(id); Do we allow that (defining an index on a view)? [ tries it ] Apparently so :-( I would argue that this should be disallowed, since it does not do anything useful and can only mislead people into thinking that it has some effect. > This is a hacky sort of way to do it (we allow you to make the internal > form that a unique constraint has via create index even on views which > I don't believe would ever be used :( ) and may not continue working > forever. Since triggers on a view won't do anything either, I don't see how one could expect REFERENCES to a view to work. The system ought to reject all this stuff as unimplemented. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: