Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] "\ef |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 15645.1216826361@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на |
Re: [PATCH] "\ef |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] "\ef |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Marko Kreen" <markokr@gmail.com> writes: >> [ re pg_get_functiondef ] > Please make it use full qualified names (schema.name) for both > function name and result types. Current search_path juggling > the pg_dump does is major PITA. Qualifying the function name seems like a good idea, but I'd advise against tinkering with the datatype references. It'll be hard to do correctly and it will make things very substantially uglier. Do you really want to show, eg, "pg_catalog.int4" rather than "integer"? If you leave the backend code do what it wants to do here, the only way that there would be a problem is if someone changed their search_path in between pg_get_functiondef and trying to re-load the function definition. Which certainly ain't gonna happen for \ef, and it seems a bit implausible for any other use-case either. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: