Re: memory leak regression 9.1 versus 8.1
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: memory leak regression 9.1 versus 8.1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 15633.1336601316@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | memory leak regression 9.1 versus 8.1 (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: memory leak regression 9.1 versus 8.1
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes: > I'm working on an upgrade of PostgreSQL embedded in a product from > version 8.1.x to 9.1.x. One particular PL/pgSQL function is giving us an > issue as there seems to be a rather severe regression in memory usage -- > a query that finishes in 8.1 causes an out of memory exception on 9.1. I see no memory leak at all in this example, either in HEAD or 9.1 branch tip. Perhaps whatever you're seeing is an already-fixed bug? Another likely theory is that you've changed settings from the 8.1 installation. I would expect this example to eat about 10 times work_mem (due to one tuplestore for each generate_series invocation), and that's more or less what I see happening here. A large work_mem could look like a leak, but it isn't. If you need further help in debugging, try launching the postmaster under a fairly restrictive memory ulimit, so that the backend will get a malloc failure before it starts to swap too badly. The memory map it will then print on stderr should point to where the memory is going. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: