Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 15608.1485220543@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes: > * Jim Nasby (Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com) wrote: >> As others have mentioned, right now practically no one enables this, >> so we've got zero data on how useful it might actually be. > Uhm, Peter G just said that Heroku enables this on all their databases > and have yet to see a false-positive report or an issue with having it > enabled. > That, plus the reports and evidence we've seen in the past couple days, > look like a pretty ringing endorsement for having them. You must have read a different Peter G than I did. What I read was >> I don't recall ever seeing a checksum failure on a Heroku Postgres >> database, which did not sound like an endorsement to me. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: