Re: Optimizing Read-Only Scalability
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Optimizing Read-Only Scalability |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 15593.1242322131@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Optimizing Read-Only Scalability (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Optimizing Read-Only Scalability
Re: Optimizing Read-Only Scalability |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: > In a thread on -perform it has been observed that our Read-Only > scalability is not as good as it could be. One problem being that we > need to scan the whole of the ProcArray to derive a snapshot, which > becomes the dominant task with many users. GetSnapshotData doesn't take an exclusive lock. Neither does start or end of a read-only transaction. AFAIK there is no reason, and certainly no shred of experimental evidence, to think that ProcArrayLock contention is the bottleneck for read-only scenarios. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: