Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 15563.1254845821@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls (KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls
Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> writes: > I rebased the largeobject access controls patch to the CVS HEAD > because of the patch confliction to the default ACL patch. Quick comment on this --- I think that using a syscache for large objects is probably not a good idea. There is no provision in the catcache code for limiting the cache size anymore, and that means that anybody who touches a large number of large objects is going to blow out memory. We removed the old cache limit code because that seemed most sensible for the use of the caches for regular catalog objects, but I don't think LOs will have the same characteristics with respect to either number of objects or locality of access. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: