Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1556.957489932@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
>> Would a pg_upgrade fix this, or do I have to do a whole dump/reload?
> pg_upgrade *should* work, but if I were you I'd make a backup dump
> first, just in case. I don't trust pg_upgrade very much...
Oh, btw: pg_upgrade will *not* work to save and reload your group
definitions, because neither it nor pg_dumpall do anything at all with
pg_group! For that matter, a full dumpall/reload won't preserve
groups either!
I griped about that a week or so ago, but no one seems to have picked up
on it. Do you want to consider that a "must fix" problem as well?
I think it's a pretty minor fix, but considering how late we are in the
cycle...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: