[BUGS]
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | [BUGS] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 15541.1502223315@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [BUGS] (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] your mail
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > Perhaps, for v11, we should actually make sure there's no memory context > etc set during _PG_init() to catch such problems earlier? I don't see much of a way to do that in the "typical" case where the library load happens as a result of a SQL command. You can't just say "oh, we're not in a transaction" and then later "wait, yes we are". Maybe we should recommend that extension authors test their libraries in the preload scenario ... regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: