Re: [HACKERS] reload-through-the-top-parent switch the partition table
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] reload-through-the-top-parent switch the partition table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 15533.1501696711@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] reload-through-the-top-parent switch the partition table (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] reload-through-the-top-parent switch the partition table
Re: [HACKERS] reload-through-the-top-parent switch the partition table Re: [HACKERS] reload-through-the-top-parent switch the partitiontable |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> --restore-via-partition-root ? > I worry someone will think that pg_dump is now restoring stuff, but it isn't. Well, the point is that the commands it emits will cause the eventual restore to go through the root. Anyway, I think trying to avoid using a verb altogether is going to result in a very stilted option name. I notice that the option list already includes some references to "insert", so maybe "--insert-via-partition-root"? Although you could argue that that's confusing when we're using COPY. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: