Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums
От | Michael Banck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1552385626.4947.50.camel@credativ.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums (Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums
Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, Am Montag, den 11.03.2019, 14:11 +0000 schrieb Sergei Kornilov: > > if (badblocks > 0) > > return 1; > > Small question: why return 1 instead of exit(1)? I have a feeling it is project policy to return 0 from main(), and exit(1) if a program aborts with an error. In the above case, the program finishes more-or-less as intended (no abort), but due to errors found on the way, does not return with 0. I don't mind either way and probably exit(1) makes more sense, but I wanted to explain why it is like that. Michael -- Michael Banck Projektleiter / Senior Berater Tel.: +49 2166 9901-171 Fax: +49 2166 9901-100 Email: michael.banck@credativ.de credativ GmbH, HRB Mönchengladbach 12080 USt-ID-Nummer: DE204566209 Trompeterallee 108, 41189 Mönchengladbach Geschäftsführung: Dr. Michael Meskes, Jörg Folz, Sascha Heuer Unser Umgang mit personenbezogenen Daten unterliegt folgenden Bestimmungen: https://www.credativ.de/datenschutz
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: