Re: How reliable are the stats collector stats?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How reliable are the stats collector stats? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 15504.1079157063@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | How reliable are the stats collector stats? (Eric Ridge <ebr@tcdi.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: How reliable are the stats collector stats?
Re: How reliable are the stats collector stats? |
Список | pgsql-general |
Eric Ridge <ebr@tcdi.com> writes: > Could pg_stats_user_indexes be lying? Jan probably knows this stuff better than I, but my guess is that if the counter type you are looking at is incrementing at all, then it's not too far off. I certainly can't think of a failure mechanism that would cause some indexes to be shown with zero hits when other indexes do get hits. > I realize the real question is "why aren't these indexes being used", Up to a point. If it's a unique index then you may want the uniqueness-check functionality even if the index is never used for searches. (I think that pg_stats only counts search probes, not accesses made in connection with insertions, but I'm too tired to go double-check this.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: