Re: Segmentation Fault in logical decoding get/peek API
От | jfinzel |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Segmentation Fault in logical decoding get/peek API |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1550176423593-0.post@n3.nabble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Segmentation Fault in logical decoding get/peek API (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Segmentation Fault in logical decoding get/peek API
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
We ran into a segmentation fault using peek_changes that appears identical with what is described in this unfinished thread. We are running pg 10.3, and the segfault was fixed by us upgrading to 10.6. However, we could not find any clearly related fixes in any of the release notes for 10.4-6 relating to this bug fix. I did find this commit that I believe fixes the issue: https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/bba8c612117416907f332fce8b9e80b748e0b798 If this indeed fixes a critical issue as we think it does, could someone please add it in the right place to the release notes? Would it be useful to anyone for us to provide any more diagnostics for how we encountered this bug? I have a core dump and stack trace. We encountered it during a peek_changes being run and fetched via a cursor. The same peek_changes from the same LSN actually succeeds after recovery. specinsert is null here: Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. #0 0x000000000084a914 in ReorderBufferCommit (rb=0x1e236c0, xid=316524727, commit_lsn=9825880784664, end_lsn=9825880787976, commit_time=603381553004372, origin_id=0, origin_lsn=0) at reorderbuffer.c:1395 1395 Assert(specinsert->data.tp.oldtuple == NULL); Some interesting notes are that we are doing INSERT ON CONFLICT UPDATE (we are not using DO NOTHING), and the table of interest has a btree gist index. I am certain that the decoding of this SQL process is somehow related to this segfault. Another note of interest is that we have been decoding using pglogical from this system for some time with no issues, so this is definitely unique to the use of the peek_changes function. Please advise, thanks! -- Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-bugs-f2117394.html
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: