Re: estimating # of distinct values
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: estimating # of distinct values |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 15389.1293760924@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: estimating # of distinct values (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: estimating # of distinct values
Re: estimating # of distinct values |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > I was thinking that we could have two different ANALYZE modes, one > "full" and one "incremental"; autovacuum could be modified to use one or > the other depending on how many changes there are (of course, the user > could request one or the other, too; not sure what should be the default > behavior). How is an incremental ANALYZE going to work at all? It has no way to find out the recent changes in the table, for *either* inserts or deletes. Unless you want to seqscan the whole table looking for tuples with xmin later than something-or-other ... which more or less defeats the purpose. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: