Re: BUG #17391: While using --with-ssl=openssl and PG_TEST_EXTRA='ssl' options, SSL tests fail on OpenBSD 7.0
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #17391: While using --with-ssl=openssl and PG_TEST_EXTRA='ssl' options, SSL tests fail on OpenBSD 7.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1537890.1644462214@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #17391: While using --with-ssl=openssl and PG_TEST_EXTRA='ssl' options, SSL tests fail on OpenBSD 7.0 (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #17391: While using --with-ssl=openssl and PG_TEST_EXTRA='ssl' options, SSL tests fail on OpenBSD 7.0
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes: > On 8 Feb 2022, at 01:30, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> ..could we get away with ignoring EPIPE/ECONNRESET in writes during connection >> startup? We'd notice the failure soon enough on the read side if it's not this >> problem. (This seems a bit related to libpq's other hacks that postpone >> recognition of write failures.) > Off the cuff I can't think of a case where it would lead to adverse effects > *during startup*. Just to note that I have a plan for fixing this part. I've concluded that it was a design error to implement the write_failed error postponement mechanism in pqSendSome, and instead we should shove it down a couple of abstraction layers into pqsecure_raw_write. This'd visibly have no effect on non-encrypted connections, because pqSendSome is the only caller of pqsecure_write. But in encrypted connections, we'd be additionally allowing write-failure postponement during OpenSSL's internal machinations, which seems to be exactly what's wanted now that we have seen this failure mode. There are some details to work through, but I hope to have a patch soon. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: