Re: Removing useless DISTINCT clauses
От | Jim Finnerty |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Removing useless DISTINCT clauses |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1535030950581-0.post@n3.nabble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Removing useless DISTINCT clauses (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Removing useless DISTINCT clauses
Re: Removing useless DISTINCT clauses |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I was thinking about this last night and I realized that putting the new hasModifiedDistinct flag on the PlannerInfo struct eliminates the need to deal with the serialization issues, and makes it simpler. Here's a new patch (v7) that puts the bool on the PlannerInfo struct, and adds a couple of tests. re: why did you apply the patch on v10? I'm developing on a v10.5 codebase at the moment, though this will change soon. If the v7 patch doesn't apply cleanly on later versions, please let me know and I'll fix it. re: if you're proposing the patch for v12, why do you care about catversion? Only because it would be a problem to test the patch on 10.5 with a catversion change that wouldn't come until v12. With the v7 patch this issue is moot because it no longer requires a catversion change. cheers, /Jim distinct_opt_v7.patch <http://www.postgresql-archive.org/file/t348990/distinct_opt_v7.patch> -- Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: