Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Lower *_freeze_max_age minimum values.
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Lower *_freeze_max_age minimum values. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 15337.1444052398@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Lower *_freeze_max_age minimum values. (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Lower *_freeze_max_age minimum
values.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2015-09-24 12:39:54 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> I'm surprised the error has survived this long. Without checking I >> can't say what's the best solution either, but I would opt for >> documenting the limits we have -- if we want to change them back to 0 I >> say that merits its own discussion. > How about simply removing that sentence? I.e. something like > <literal>autovacuum_freeze_max_age</> larger than the system-wide setting > - (it can only be set smaller). Note that while you can set > - <literal>autovacuum_freeze_max_age</> very small, or even zero, this is > - usually unwise since it will force frequent vacuuming. > + (it can only be set smaller). > </para> How about "Setting autovacuum_freeze_max_age to very small values is unwise since it will force frequent vacuuming." regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: