Re: Automatic PG_PRINTF_ATTRIBUTE
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Automatic PG_PRINTF_ATTRIBUTE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 15287.1416618797@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Automatic PG_PRINTF_ATTRIBUTE (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Automatic PG_PRINTF_ATTRIBUTE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 2014-11-21 03:12:14 -0500, Noah Misch wrote: >> ... I'm >> increasingly using an affected compiler, because it builds twice as quickly as >> today's gcc. > No objections to the patch itself, but this seems like quite the odd > approach. Sure those old compilers might be a bit faster, but they also > report many fewer legitimate warnings and such. > A full tree doesn't take that long? A full recompile sess than 40s here > and src/backend alone is much faster. ISTM that if it's currently too > slow, improving the concurrency of the build a bit more is a wiser > path... As far as that goes, ccache is a miracle worker. But I don't know how well it works on Windows :-( regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: