Re: Propose RC1 for Friday ...
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Propose RC1 for Friday ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1526.1037295271@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Propose RC1 for Friday ... ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Propose RC1 for Friday ...
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu> writes: > Sorry to be a pest, but I'd like to re-raise the issue I brought up > regarding a performance regression from 7.2.3, when subqueries are pulled > up and merged with their parent. > ... > Tom was not excited about making the original change (we don't guarantee > the order of WHERE clauses, which is what would be required for this to > be a real fix), and is resisting changing it back, partly because neither > order is the right thing. My argument is that we can't do the right thing > right now, anyway (feature freeze), so let's put it back the way it was in > the last stable release, so as not to break (o.k., dramatically slow down) > existing queries. Well, we could define it as a bug ;-) --- that is, a performance regression. I'd be happier about adding a dozen lines of code to sort quals by whether or not they contain a subplan than about flip-flopping on the original patch. That would actually solve the class of problem you exhibited, whereas the other is just a band-aid that happens to work for your particular example. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: