Re: Missing array support

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Joe Conway wrote:
>> Yeah, but isn't feature freeze July 1?

> Yes, but once the "feature" is in, you can adjust it if it isn't
> working.
> I am just pointing out that beating the system is a popular hacker
> passtime during beta.  :-)

It's just a matter of staking out what's considered an implemented
feature.  The ARRAY[] syntax is definitely in, so if it needs a few
adjustments around the edges to make it more spec-compliant, no one
will blink at doing that during beta.

If I were you I'd file this on the to-fix-later list and concentrate
on polymorphic aggregates during the next couple days.  If that's not
done by Tuesday it will be a tough sell to put in during beta.
        regards, tom lane