Re: postgresql9.5 partition table
От | mark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgresql9.5 partition table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 151a18c0.b4bc.160a2973bc9.Coremail.pgroad@163.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgresql9.5 partition table (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Hi Herrera
Thanks for your reply.
I will try it in postgresql10.
Regards,
Mark
发自网易邮箱手机版
Thanks for your reply.
I will try it in postgresql10.
Regards,
Mark
发自网易邮箱手机版
mark wrote:在2017年12月29日 21:46,Alvaro Herrera 写道:
> I defined a table using 1000 partition tables.
> When I deleted or updated this table. It used a lot of memory and
> postmaster process is killed by OS. When I defined the same table
> using 100 partition tables. It can normally be updated and deleted.
> what is reason of this?
Postgres 9.5 is not prepared to deal with thousands of partitions.
You can try the improved partitioning with the new syntax introduced in
Postgres 10 -- you may have better luck there. Please test it.
If it still doesn't work, let us know in detail what you tested and how
it failed.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: