Re: Recovery Test Framework
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Recovery Test Framework |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 15178.1231809166@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Recovery Test Framework (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>) |
Ответы |
Re: Recovery Test Framework
Re: Recovery Test Framework Re: Recovery Test Framework |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes: >>> 1. Remove the messages size limits on -hackers. They serve no useful >>> purpose, and they interfere with our development process. >> >> Agreed, or at least boost it up a good bit more. > the question really is how much "a bit more" is - right now the limit is > 100000 characters which limits us to ~70KB of attachments (around the > size of the Hot-standby patch if bzip2 compressed). > The SE-Postgres patch for example is ~650KB uncompressed - if we want to > cope with uncompressed patches that large we would have to increase > the current limit by a factor of 10 at least. I feel no need to encourage people to send huge patches uncompressed ;-) gzip normally gets at least 3x or 4x on large diffs. So a limit around 250K ought to be enough. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: