Re: SCSI vs. IDE performance test
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SCSI vs. IDE performance test |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 15166.1067294380@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SCSI vs. IDE performance test ("Rick Gigger" <rick@alpinenetworking.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SCSI vs. IDE performance test
|
Список | pgsql-general |
"Rick Gigger" <rick@alpinenetworking.com> writes: > It seems to me file system journaling should fix the whole problem by giving > you a record of what was actually commited to disk and what was not. Nope, a journaling FS has exactly the same problem Postgres does (because the underlying "WAL" concept is the same: write the log entries before you change the files they describe). If the drive lies about write order, the FS can be screwed just as badly. Now the FS code might have a low-level way to force write order that Postgres doesn't have access to ... but simply uttering the magic incantation "journaling file system" will not make this problem disappear. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: