Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Non-superuser subscription owners |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1514479.1641664638@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Non-superuser subscription owners (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
... btw, I'd like to complain that this new test script consumes a completely excessive amount of time. On my fairly-new primary workstation: [12:48:00] t/027_nosuperuser.pl ............... ok 22146 ms ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 1.12 cusr 0.95 csys = 2.09 CPU) The previously-slowest script in the subscription suite is [12:48:23] t/100_bugs.pl ...................... ok 7048 ms ( 0.00 usr 0.00 sys + 2.85 cusr 0.99 csys = 3.84 CPU) and the majority of the scripts clock in at more like 2 to 4 seconds. So I don't think I'm out of line in saying that this test is consuming an order of magnitude more time than is justified. I do not wish to see this much time added to every check-world run till kingdom come for this one feature/issue. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: