Re: BUG #12469: pg_locks shows locks held by pids not found i n pg_stat_activity or ps
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #12469: pg_locks shows locks held by pids not found i n pg_stat_activity or ps |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1511260135.4208486.1420826855952.JavaMail.yahoo@jws10056.mail.ne1.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #12469: pg_locks shows locks held by pids not found i n pg_stat_activity or ps (kop@meme.com) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #12469: pg_locks shows locks held by pids not found
i n pg_stat_activity or ps
Re: BUG #12469: pg_locks shows locks held by pids not found i n pg_stat_activity or ps |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
"kop@meme.com" <kop@meme.com> wrote: > I found that after running a large transaction (for days, it's still > running) and then running out of shared memory that pg_locks reports locks > held by pids that do not seem to exist, either in ps output or in > pg_stat_activity. That is not a bug. For details see either of the below links: http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/backend/storage/lmgr/README-SSI;hb=master http://vldb.org/pvldb/vol5/p1850_danrkports_vldb2012.pdf The short explanation is that SIReadLocks on a serializable transaction may need to be kept until overlapping transactions terminate. You can minimize this by flagging transactions which will not modify data as READ ONLY. If a READ ONLY transaction is expected to run for a very long time, it is wise to also flag it as DEFERRABLE. -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: