Re: pgxs: build infrastructure for extensions v4
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgxs: build infrastructure for extensions v4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 15085.1091577169@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgxs: build infrastructure for extensions v4 (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgxs: build infrastructure for extensions v4
Re: pgxs: build infrastructure for extensions v4 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes: > One question did arise, however. In order to use pgxs I needed to do: > make install-all-headers > instead of: > make install > I seem to recall some discussion about this, but at the time didn't > realize the impact. IMHO pgxs support (including all needed headers) > should be installed by default, else we won't be able to count on it > being there when needed. Any chance we can revisit this? AFAICS the packagers (RPM etc) will continue to think that these files belong in a postgresql-devel RPM, and will not include them in a base package. I'm not sure of the point of trying to force installation in a build from source given that much of the world isn't going to be using a source package anyway. However, we could certainly talk about altering the default behavior (eg, install becomes install-no-headers and install-all-headers becomes part of the default install target). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: