Re: BUG #16653: Regression in CTE evaluation
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #16653: Regression in CTE evaluation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1508304.1601832989@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #16653: Regression in CTE evaluation (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #16653: Regression in CTE evaluation
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 04:18:43PM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote: >> The following SQL worked in versions 9 through 12. It is throwing an error >> in version 13. > Uh, I am able to reproduce the error in PG _12_ as well, and I am sure > it is related to this change in PG 12: > Allow common table expressions (CTEs) to be inlined into the outer query > (Andreas Karlsson, Andrew Gierth, David Fetter, Tom Lane) Indeed. The planner now inlines the WITH query, allowing "CAST(exp_days.days || ' days' AS interval)" to be folded to a constant, whereupon you get an error since indeed ' days' isn't valid interval input. Sorry, I reject the position that this is a bug. It was something of an implementation artifact that you didn't get this error before. As of v12, we provide explicit control over whether a WITH query can be inlined or not, and you need to use that control if you have a query that's dependent on inlining not happening. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: