Re: unique problem
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: unique problem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 15043.1099329325@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | unique problem ("Joolz" <joolz@arbodienst-limburg.nl>) |
Ответы |
Re: unique problem
|
Список | pgsql-general |
"Joolz" <joolz@arbodienst-limburg.nl> writes: > Is there a bug in the UNIQUE behaviour? No known bugs, anyway. I'm inclined to guess that your target table has slightly different datatypes than the source, and that results in equal values for some reason (such as fractional values being rounded to integer, or char vs varchar having different ideas about significance of trailing blanks). > Is there any way I can DEFER the unique clause, or remove it and put > it back later? You can always drop and re-add the constraint ... but I'll be pretty surprised if that gets around the problem (ie, I bet re-adding the constraint will fail). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: