Re: Should we get rid of custom_variable_classes altogether?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should we get rid of custom_variable_classes altogether? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 15021.1317652908@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Should we get rid of custom_variable_classes altogether? (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should we get rid of custom_variable_classes
altogether?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > On 10/03/2011 10:17 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Right. Getting rid of custom_variable_classes should actually make >> those use-cases easier, since it will eliminate a required setup step. > So are we going to sanction using this as a poor man's session variable > mechanism? People already are doing that, sanctioned or not. > If so maybe we should at least warn that anything set will be accessible > by all roles, so security definer functions for example should be wary > of trusting such values. Since it's not documented anywhere, I'm not sure where we'd put such a warning. I think anyone bright enough to think of such a hack should be able to see the potential downsides, anyway. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: