Re: Switching Primary Keys to BigInt
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Switching Primary Keys to BigInt |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14e326d2-7ee3-be5a-feb5-4e6c43425fb8@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Switching Primary Keys to BigInt (Mohamed Wael Khobalatte <mkhobalatte@grubhub.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Switching Primary Keys to BigInt
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 7/21/20 2:18 PM, Mohamed Wael Khobalatte wrote: >> > test_(aklaver)5432> alter table change_seq alter COLUMN id set data type >> bigint; >> ALTER TABLE >> test_(aklaver)5432> \d change_seq >> Table "public.change_seq" >> Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default >> --------+--------+-----------+----------+---------------------------------------- >> >> id | bigint | | not null | >> nextval('change_seq_id_seq'::regclass) >> Indexes: >> "change_seq_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id) > > This is significant downtime, since it locks exclusively, no? We want to > avoid that. Yeah, I thought the int --> bigint would not do a table rewrite. Testing showed otherwise. Forget that idea. > > > Side note- EOL for 9.6 is coming next year so just a plug for > upgrading when possible, perhaps utilizing pglogical to get to v11 or 12. > > Yep, we are painfully aware. The id growth will beat us to it, so we > need to deal with that first. > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: