re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing]
От | matthew green |
---|---|
Тема | re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14983.986493996@splode.eterna.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing] (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing]
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au> writes: > digging into the regression.diffs, i can see that: > - reltime failed becauseit just had: > ! psql: Backend startup failed > The postmaster log file should have more info, but a firstthought is > that you ran up against process or swap-space limitations. The parallel > check has fifty-oddprocesses going at its peak, which is more than the > default per-user process limit on many Unixen. > hmm,maxproc=80 on this system currently and i wasn't really doing anything > else. it has 256MB ram and 280MB swap (unused). exactly what am i looking > for in the postmaster.log file? it is 65kb long... Look for messages about "forkfailed". They should give a kernel error message too. after running `unlimit' (tcsh) before `make check', the only failures i have are the horology (expected) and the inherit sorted failures, on NetBSD/sparc64. i also believe the `Bad address' errors were caused when the test was run in an NFS mounted directory. .mrg.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: