Re: sort_mem statistics ...
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: sort_mem statistics ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14977.1129676236@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | sort_mem statistics ... ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: sort_mem statistics ...
Re: sort_mem statistics ... |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes: > On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Tom Lane wrote: >> Looking at the code, I notice that the messages are all emitted at level >> NOTICE. Perhaps that was not such a good idea --- it'd be pretty much >> in-your-face if it were on all the time. Does anyone think it'd be a >> good idea to emit the trace_sort messages at level LOG, instead? > If someone sets trace_sort, does it matter what level its emit'd at? Well, yeah. It depends whether you are thinking of the trace feature as being used interactively, or as something turned on to gather data over time in a production installation. In the second case you'd want the info to go to the postmaster log, but not want to see it dumped on your terminal all the time ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: