Wrong masklen in result of netmask()/hostmask()
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Wrong masklen in result of netmask()/hostmask() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14966.1070251615@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Wrong masklen in result of netmask()/hostmask()
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Per this gripe: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2003-11/msg00233.php I think that the recent IPv6 changes made an undocumented and un-agreed-to change in the semantics of netmask(). The previous behavior of netmask() was that it always delivered a result with a masklen of 32. It seems to me that the obvious extension of that for IPv6 is to deliver masklen of either 32 or 128 depending on whether the input is IPv4 or IPv6. The actual behavior in 7.4 is that the masklen is the same as the input value's, for example: 7.3: regression=# select masklen(netmask('192.168.1.0/23'));masklen --------- 32 (1 row) 7.4: regression=# select masklen(netmask('192.168.1.0/23'));masklen --------- 23 (1 row) The previous behavior had been agreed to at one point: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2000-10/msg01132.php I can't find anyplace in the archives where the change was discussed at all. hostmask() was not in 7.3 so its behavior is a bit up for grabs, but I think it ought to return the same masklen as netmask(). Comments? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: