Re: pgpool versus sequences
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgpool versus sequences |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14930.1307025118@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgpool versus sequences (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgpool versus sequences
Re: pgpool versus sequences |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: >> Yeah -- why is LOCK SEQUENCE foo_seq not allowed? �Seems a simple thing >> to have. > It cause a grammar conflict. That's a lot of work for a purely cosmetic issue, though. What would be trivial is to let this work: regression=# create sequence s1; CREATE SEQUENCE regression=# begin; BEGIN regression=# lock table s1; ERROR: "s1" is not a table We should do that anyway, even if we put in the effort to support the other syntax. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: