Chris <chrisb@nimrod.itg.telstra.com.au> writes:
> Emile D Snyder wrote:
>>
>> I know there's been a certain amount of buzz over the
>> usefulness/methodology of the tests, but Great Bridge just published a set
>> of tests using "Major Proprietary #1", ...#2, etc. kind of terminology.
> Of which #1 may or may not be Oracle, and #2 may or may not be MSSQL.
> :-)
The page of followup details that GB posted a little later includes
version numbers of all the tested servers. These provide, um, a
pretty broad hint about the identity of Proprietary #1 and Proprietary
#2...
regards, tom lane