Re: [HACKERS] drop support for Python 2.3

Hi Tom,

On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 13:48 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hmph.  I can't see any relevant-looking source changes between 8.4.13
> and 8.4.15, which I have laying about here and which works fine.
> I wonder if Red Hat is carrying some distro-specific patch that
> breaks this case? 

Just downloaded SRPM, and I don't *think* so their patch would break this.

>  Or conceivably it's timezone dependent?

FWIW, the timezone of the server is GMT+3, if that is what you are asking.

> Anyway, my inclination is just to tweak that test a bit so it doesn't
> trip over the problem.  The point of the test is mainly to see if the
> [clock] command works at all, not to exercise any specific parameter
> choices.  Would you check whether this:
>
> $ tclsh
> % clock format [clock scan "1/26/2010"] -format "%U"
>
> gives the expected result "04" on that machine?

Yes, I got 04.

Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR