Re: Do we need so many hint bits?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Do we need so many hint bits? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14867.1353189211@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Do we need so many hint bits? (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Do we need so many hint bits?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes: > What's the problem with that? If you already have the VM buffer pinned > (which should be possible if we keep the VM buffer in a longer-lived > structure), then doing the test is almost as cheap as checking > PD_ALL_VISIBLE, because you don't need any locks. Really? What about race conditions? Specifically, I think what you suggest is likely to be unreliable on machines with weak memory ordering. Consider possibility that someone else just changed the VM bit. Getting a lock ensures synchronization. (Yeah, it's possible that we could use some primitive cheaper than a lock ... but it's not going to be free.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: