Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14852.1432059763@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...) (Mike Blackwell <mike.blackwell@rrd.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)
Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Mike Blackwell <mike.blackwell@rrd.com> writes: > See for example > http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/text.102/b14218/cqoper.htm#i997330, > Table 3-1, third row, showing the precedence of '?'. Further down the > page, under "Fuzzy" see "Backward Compatibility Syntax". If I'm reading that right, that isn't a SQL-level operator but an operator in their text search query language, which would only appear in SQL queries within string literals (compare tsquery's query operators in PG). So it wouldn't be a hazard for ?-substitution, as long as the substituter was bright enough to not change string literals. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: