Re: pgindent run next week?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgindent run next week? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1485.1558115222@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgindent run next week? (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgindent run next week?
Re: pgindent run next week? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2019-05-17 10:29:46 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Also, how do people feel about adopting the function prototype >> indenting change discussed in >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAEepm%3D0P3FeTXRcU5B2W3jv3PgRVZ-kGUXLGfd42FFhUROO3ug%40mail.gmail.com > I think it'd be a huge improvement. Yeah, that's probably the biggest remaining bug/issue in pgindent. > Would we want to also apply this to the back branches to avoid spurious > conflicts? I dunno, how far back are you thinking? I've occasionally wished we could reindent all the back branches to match HEAD, but realistically, people carrying out-of-tree patches would scream. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: