Re: Commitfest problems
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Commitfest problems |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1485.1418317336@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Commitfest problems (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > On 12/11/14 1:35 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> While the commitfest process hasn't changed much and was very successful >> in the first few years, a few things have changed externally: >> >> 1 more new developers involved in contributing small patches >> 2 more full-time developers creating big patches >> 3 increased time demands on experienced Postgres developers > The number of patches registered in the commit fests hasn't actually > changed over the years. It has always fluctuated between 50 and 100, > depending on the point of the release cycle. So I don't think (1) is > necessarily the problem. Interesting point, but of course not all patches are equal; perhaps the problem is that we're seeing fewer of (1) and more of (2) in the commitfest queue. Is there any easy way to quantify the size/complexity of the patches in past fests? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: