Re: now() vs transaction_timestamp()
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: now() vs transaction_timestamp() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14825.1538842224@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: now() vs transaction_timestamp() (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: now() vs transaction_timestamp()
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> writes: > On 06.10.2018 00:25, Tom Lane wrote: >> So maybe the right answer is to change the parallel mode infrastructure >> so it transmits xactStartTimestamp, making transaction_timestamp() >> retroactively safe, and then in HEAD only we could re-mark now() as >> safe. We might as well do the same for statement_timestamp as well. > Attached please find very small patch fixing the problem (propagating > transaction and statement timestamps to workers). That's a bit too small ;-) ... one demonstrable problem with it is that the parallel worker will report the wrong xactStartTimestamp to pgstat_report_xact_timestamp(), since you aren't jamming the transmitted value in soon enough. Also, I found that ParallelWorkerMain executes at least two transactions before it ever gets to the "main" transaction that does real work, and I didn't much care for the fact that those were running with worker-local values of xactStartTimestamp and stmtStartTimestamp. So I rearranged things a bit to ensure that parallel workers wouldn't generate their own values for either timestamp, and pushed it. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: